ReviewNutrients2025
Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications.
Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Ultra-Processed Foods, MASLD, and Cognitive Aging: A Processing-Centered Gut-Liver-Brain Axis Perspective.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Article
- Ultra-processed food exposure and health outcomes: Current evidence, controversies, and future perspectives.EXCLI journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a prevalent disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) with an adverse impact on quality of life. The global consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF) is rapidly increasing, and UPF intake has recently been linked to a wide range of metabolic and chronic diseases. The potential role of UPF consumption in the onset and symptom generation of IBS is emerging but remains unclear. This narrative review synthesizes epidemiological evidence on the association between UPF consumption and IBS, integrates mechanistic insights from experimental and clinical studies and suggests clinical implications based on the current state of knowledge. Observational studies suggest that higher UPF intake may be associated with increased risk of IBS, although the evidence base is limited and subject to methodological challenges. Mechanistic studies indicate that additives including emulsifiers and non-nutritive sweeteners can alter pathways relevant to IBS symptom generation, such as gut microbiota composition, impair intestinal barrier function and trigger low-grade inflammation. Current evidence supports a possible link between UPF consumption and IBS. Increasing overall dietary quality and reducing UPF intake are promising complementary strategies to established dietary interventions. Future intervention trials may provide insights into relevant biological mechanisms, particularly if such changes co-occur with symptom improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.