ArticleViruses2025
Molecular Responses to Avian Reovirus Inoculation In Vitro.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Avian reovirus (ARV) is an important pathogen of poultry, yet the molecular responses to ARV across cell types remain unknown. The present study explores the differential transcriptomic responses to ARV S1133 infection in three cell types, i.e., chicken embryo kidney (CEK), chicken embryo liver (CELi), and macrophage-derived cells (HD11) at 6, 12, and 24 h post-inoculation (hpi). CELi cells exhibited the highest viral replication rates at all timepoints, with maximal titer observed at 24 hpi, whereas HD11 cells showed limited viral replication but extensive host transcriptional activity. Differential gene expression analysis revealed that macrophage-derived (HD11) cells, despite the lower viral load, presented the most pronounced transcriptional changes. CEK cells demonstrated a unique activation of immune-related pathways, specifically those related to lymphocyte chemotaxis and type II interferon response. CELi cells showed upregulation of expression of genes involved in defense against viruses. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis identified key antiviral genes, including IFI6, OASL, RSAD2, SAMD9L, and MX1, as central nodes. In CELi, significant alternative splicing events were observed in transcripts of several genes, including those implicated in immunity. Taken together, results indicate that inoculation of ARV triggered cell-type and time-dependent viral replication and stimulated transcriptional activity linked with unique but functionally interconnected pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.