ArticleViruses2025
Analysis of the Relationship Between the Charge Increment of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and Evolution.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The changes in charge distribution caused by mutations in the spike protein may play a crucial role in balancing infectivity and immune evasion during the evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). To explore how charge increments in spike protein variants influence viral evolution, a statistical analysis was conducted on 57 SARS-CoV-2 variants, examining relationships between charge distribution, lineage divergence, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) affinity, immune evasion, and receptor-binding domain (RBD) expression. A phylogenetic tree was also reconstructed using only the charge properties of mutation sites. Results indicated that with increasing lineage divergence, overall positive charge initially rose sharply and then more gradually. Partitioning the spike protein into three domains-the RBD, the N-terminal flanking region (B-RBD), and the C-terminal flanking region (A-RBD)-revealed distinct patterns: positive charge increased in the RBD and A-RBD, whereas the B-RBD accumulated negative charge. Charge increments were negatively associated with ACE2 affinity and RBD expression but positively correlated with immune evasion. The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.