ArticleViruses2025
Real-World Effectiveness of Antiviral Prophylaxis for Preventing Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Reactivation in Patients Undergoing Immunosuppressive Therapy.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hepatitis-B virus reactivation during Immunosuppressive therapy: Clinical observations from a tertiary care center.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the characteristics of patients receiving prophylactic antiviral therapy against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection due to immunosuppressive treatment and assessed the occurrence of HBV reactivation. Between January 2015 and January 2025, 199 adult patients followed in the Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology outpatient clinic who had received prophylactic oral antiviral therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, underlying diseases, immunosuppressive treatment history, HBV serological results, biochemical and virological findings, and prophylactic antiviral regimens were recorded. Patients were stratified into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups according to the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) 2025 classification. The mean age was 60.4 years; 50.3% of patients were male. Serologically, 26.6% were HBsAg- and anti-HBc-positive, 33.2% showed isolated anti-HBc positivity, and 40.2% had dual anti-HBc/anti-HBs positivity. The risk of HBV reactivation was low in 41.2%, moderate in 22.1%, and high in 36.7% of patients. Prophylaxis consisted of entecavir in 76.4%, tenofovir alafenamide in 13.1%, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in 10.5%. HBV reactivation occurred in only one patient, who had discontinued treatment. These findings emphasize the importance of HBV screening and timely prophylactic antiviral therapy in patients undergoing immunosuppression to effectively prevent HBV reactivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.