Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305429›Full record

ArticleViruses2025

Potential Vaccine or Antimicrobial Reagents: Simple Systems for Producing Lambda Display Particles (LDP) and Sheathed Lambda DNA Vaccine Particles (LDNAP).

Sidney Hayes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sidney HayesDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4218-3939

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The focus of this study was to explore phage display systems employing bacteriophage lambda (λ) gene fusions to its capsid decoration protein gpD as reagent tools for tackling disease. The biological activity of gpD-fusions was examined by testing for the retained antimicrobial toxicity of cathelicidins or defensins fused to gpD. Our previous finding that only COOH fusions of either cathelicidins or defensins to gpD were toxigenic was expanded to show that only the reduced form of fused defensin antimicrobial polypeptides was found to be toxigenic. Compared in review are gene-fusion lytic display systems (where the fusion-display gene is integrated within the viral genome) with a surrogate system, employed herein, that exogenously provides the fusion-display protein for addition to phage capsid. It is easily possible to produce fully coated lambda display particles (LDP) serving as single epitope vaccines (SEV), or antimicrobials, or to produce partially coated LDP without any complex bacteriophage genetic engineering, making the system available to all. The potential to build vaccine vector phage particles (LDNAP) comprising essentially sheathed DNA vaccines encapsulated within an environmentally protective capsid is described. LDNAP are produced by introducing a cassette into the phage genome either by phage-plasmid recombination or cloning. The cassette carries a high-level eukaryotic expression promoter driving transcription of the vaccine candidate gene and is devoid of plasmid resistance elements.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacteriophage lambdaVaccines, DNACapsid ProteinsHumansAnti-Infective AgentsCapsid ProteinsVaccines, DNAsimultaneous-multiple single epitope vaccine preparation strategysystem for preparing phage display particles and phage-encapsulated DNA vaccinesvaccine and antimicrobial agents

Identifiers

PMID41305429
PMCPMC12656833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.