Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305367›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Pseudovirus-Based Neutralization Assays as Customizable and Scalable Tools for Serological Surveillance and Immune Profiling.

Caio Bidueira Denani, Bruno Pimenta Setatino, Denise Pereira, Ingrid Siciliano Horbach, Adriana Souza Azevedo, Gabriela Coutinho, Clara Lucy Ferroco, Janaína Xavier, Robson Leite, Ewerton Santos and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Caio Bidueira DenaniLaboratório de Análise Imunomolecular, Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos (Bio-Manguinhos), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0625-5827
Bruno Pimenta SetatinoLaboratório de Análise Imunomolecular, Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos (Bio-Manguinhos), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Denise PereiraLaboratório de Análise Imunomolecular, Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos (Bio-Manguinhos), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Ingrid Siciliano HorbachLaboratório de Análise Imunomolecular, Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos (Bio-Manguinhos), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0889-6991
Adriana Souza AzevedoLaboratório de Análise Imunomolecular, Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos (Bio-Manguinhos), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7401-5107
Gabriela CoutinhoDepartamento de Desenvolvimento Experimental e Pré-Clínico (DEDEP), Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos (Bio-Manguinhos), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Clara Lucy FerrocoDepartamento de Assuntos Médicos, Estudos Clínicos e Vigilância Pós-Registro (DEAME), Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos (Bio-Manguinhos), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Janaína XavierDepartamento de Assuntos Médicos, Estudos Clínicos e Vigilância Pós-Registro (DEAME), Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos (Bio-Manguinhos), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7686-6490
Robson LeiteDepartamento de Assuntos Médicos, Estudos Clínicos e Vigilância Pós-Registro (DEAME), Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos (Bio-Manguinhos), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-8099-1899
Ewerton SantosDepartamento de Assuntos Médicos, Estudos Clínicos e Vigilância Pós-Registro (DEAME), Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos (Bio-Manguinhos), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Maria de Lourdes MaiaDepartamento de Assuntos Médicos, Estudos Clínicos e Vigilância Pós-Registro (DEAME), Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos (Bio-Manguinhos), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Waleska Dias SchwarczLaboratório de Análise Imunomolecular, Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos (Bio-Manguinhos), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8095-8846
Ivanildo Pedro SousaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Tropical, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1840-3302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) are key indicators of protection against SARS-CoV-2, and their measurement remains essential for monitoring vaccine responses and population immunity. While the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) is the gold standard, it relies on replicative viruses and is not suited for high-throughput applications. Here, both an in-house and a commercial pseudovirus-based neutralization (PBN) assay were standardized and compared with PRNT to assess performance and concordance. The in-house PBN employed a VSV-ΔG pseudovirus encoding NanoLuc and displaying the SARS-CoV-2 Spike from the Wuhan or Omicron BA.1 variants in HEK293T-hACE2 cells, whereas the commercial assay (Integral Molecular, Philadelphia, PA, USA) used a lentiviral backbone with Renilla or GFP reporters and Wuhan or Omicron XBB.1.5/XBB.1.9 Spikes in Vero E6-ACE2-TMPRSS2 cells. Both assays showed strong correlations with PRNT, the commercial assay; moreover, they offered superior reproducibility and scalability, while the in-house version provided a cost-effective alternative suitable for BSL-2 settings. A total of 600 serum samples from vaccinated individuals were analyzed by commercial PBN at collection time points, from pre-vaccination to twelve months post-second dose, enabling large-scale screening, revealing marked differences in neutralization between Wuhan and Omicron XBB.1.5/1.9, and allowing unbiased classification of low, medium, and high responders using k-means clustering. The geometric mean titers (log

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19Neutralization TestsSARS-CoV-2AnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsCOVID-19 VaccinesHEK293 CellsHumansSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVero CellsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2neutralizing antibody (nAb)PRNTpseudovirusSARS-CoV-2serological surveillance

Identifiers

PMID41305367
PMCPMC12655478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.