Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305350›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Comparative Efficacy of a Novel Topical Formulation with Antimicrobial Peptides and Encapsulated Plant Extracts Versus Conventional Therapies for Canine Otitis Externa.

Tatiana Charello Bannach, Anna Claudia Baumel Mongruel, Alberto Gonçalves Evangelista, Vitória Brigida Mielnik de Souza, Renata Voi, Michel Fleith Otuki, Marconi Rodrigues de Farias, Fernando Bittencourt Luciano

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tatiana Charello BannachGraduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba 80215-901, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0003-2211-7808
Anna Claudia Baumel MongruelGraduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba 80215-901, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9349-266X
Alberto Gonçalves EvangelistaLaboratory of Microbiology Research, Biopark Educaçäo, Toledo 85919-899, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7445-8901
Vitória Brigida Mielnik de SouzaGraduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba 80215-901, PR, Brazil.
Renata VoiGraduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba 80215-901, PR, Brazil.
Michel Fleith OtukiDepartment of Pharmacology, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0159-3878
Marconi Rodrigues de FariasGraduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba 80215-901, PR, Brazil.
Fernando Bittencourt LucianoGraduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba 80215-901, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0816-2111

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development CATALISA ICT 2022Wesen Green 001/2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canine otitis externa (OE) presents a significant challenge in veterinary medicine due to its complex, multifactorial nature and the growing issue of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) associated with conventional antibiotic use. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of a novel, antibiotic-free topical ear solution (Therapy A) containing antimicrobial peptides and encapsulated plant extracts (chamomile, calendula, rosemary, and hops) against a standard conventional treatment (Therapy B) composed of gentamicin, betamethasone valerate, and clotrimazole. A longitudinal, randomized study was conducted over four weeks with 40 domestic dogs diagnosed with OE. The dogs were divided into two groups, each receiving one of the therapies. Evaluations were performed weekly, assessing clinical signs using the Otitis Index Scoring System (OTIS-3) and a pruritus visual analog scale (pVAS), as well as ear canal pH and cytology. The results showed that Therapy A provided similar clinical efficacy in OTIS-3 and pVAS scores that were comparable to Therapy B. Cytological analysis also revealed a significant reduction in microbial presence for both groups. Notably, Therapy A was clinically effective in two of the three dogs presenting multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial infections. The novel formulation also demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no adverse drug reactions reported, in contrast to one dog in the conventional treatment group that experienced an adverse reaction. These findings suggest that the plant-based formulation is a safe and effective alternative for managing canine OE, offering a promising solution to reduce the reliance on antibiotics and corticosteroids.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial PeptidesDog DiseasesOtitis ExternaPlant ExtractsAdministration, TopicalAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDogsFemaleMaleTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial PeptidesPlant Extractsantimicrobial resistanceatopic dermatitisdermatologyveterinary

Identifiers

PMID41305350
PMCPMC12655140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.