Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305328›Full record

SynthesisPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Comprehensive Review of Nanoparticles in the Fight Against Antimicrobial Resistance.

Antonios Mouzakis, Periklis Panagopoulos, Dimitrios Papazoglou, Vasileios Petrakis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Glucosamine functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes as potential antibacterial molecules.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mechanisms ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonios MouzakisLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Periklis PanagopoulosSecond Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Dimitrios PapazoglouSecond Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4846-2178
Vasileios PetrakisSecond Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The escalating crisis of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria presents a formidable threat to global public health, necessitating the urgent development of alternative antimicrobial strategies. Nanoparticles (NPs) have emerged as a promising frontier in this effort, leveraging their unique physicochemical properties and multi-modal mechanisms of action to combat bacterial infections. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the current body of evidence on the dynamic interplay between nanoparticles and bacterial resistance. (2) Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, was performed using a combination of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms to identify relevant primary research articles. Eligibility criteria focused on studies evaluating the antimicrobial effects of nanoparticles on MDR bacterial strains, reporting on mechanisms of action, efficacy, or resistance development. (3) Results: The synthesis of findings revealed that nanoparticles exert their antimicrobial effects through multiple pathways, including the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), direct disruption of bacterial membranes, and the release of toxic ions. However, the analysis also confirmed that bacteria have evolved sophisticated defense mechanisms against nanoparticles, including surface modifications that prevent adhesion, upregulation of efflux pumps, and chemical neutralization of toxic ions. (4) Conclusions: Nanoparticles represent a potent and versatile tool in the global effort to combat antimicrobial resistance. Their long-term efficacy is not guaranteed, as bacteria have shown a remarkable capacity for adaptation. The future of this field lies in the development of rationally designed nanoparticle systems that not only possess intrinsic antimicrobial activity but also actively disarm bacterial resistance mechanisms. This includes the strategic use of synergistic combinations with conventional antibiotics and the exploration of resistance-agnostic approaches like nanotoxoid vaccines.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialNanoparticlesHumansReactive Oxygen SpeciesAnti-Bacterial AgentsReactive Oxygen Speciesantimicrobial resistancenanoparticlesnanotoxoid vaccines

Identifiers

PMID41305328
PMCPMC12655381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.