In one paragraphArticle in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
6 authors.
Cesar Cristiano BassettoDepartment of Biodiversity and Biostatistics, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-689, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2370-3561 Ana Cláudia Alexandre de AlbuquerqueDepartment of Pathology, Reproduction, and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6061-1474 José Gabriel Gonçalves LinsDepartment of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-681, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0810-1434 Guilherme Fernandes Dias CanalliDepartment of Pathology, Reproduction, and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Anandra Kauára Dos Santos GomesDepartment of Pathology, Reproduction, and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Alessandro Francisco Talamini AmaranteDepartment of Biodiversity and Biostatistics, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-689, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3995-5501 Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2010/18678-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2024/02589-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2025/13075-6National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 303624/2021-3
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
The intensity and prevalence of different gastrointestinal nematode species vary across regions worldwide.
Indexed as
Cattle DiseasesHost-Parasite InteractionsOesophagostomiasisOesophagostomumAnimalsCattleFemaleMaleParasite Egg Countcattlegastrointestinal nematodeimmunityparasitesruminants
Identifiers
PMID41305312
PMCPMC12655471
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390