ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
AI-Driven Resilient Fault Diagnosis of Bearings in Rotating Machinery.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards a Resilience-Oriented Framework for Fault Diagnosis Under Varying Operating Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictive maintenance is increasingly important in rotating machinery to prevent unexpected failures, reduce downtime, and improve operational efficiency. This study compares the efficacy of traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques in diagnosing bearing faults under varying load and speed conditions. Two classification tasks were conducted: a simpler three-class task that distinguishes healthy bearings, inner race faults, and outer race faults, and a more complex nine-class task that includes faults of varying severity in the inner and outer races. In this study, the machine learning algorithm ensemble bagged trees, achieved maximum accuracies of 93.04% for the three-class and 87.13% for the nine-class classifications, followed by neural network, SVM, KNN, decision tree, and other algorithms. For deep learning, the CNN model, trained on scalograms (time-frequency images generated by continuous wavelet transform), demonstrated superior performance, reaching up to 100% accuracy in both classification tasks after six training epochs for the nine-class classifications. While CNNs take longer training time, their superior accuracy and capability to automatically extract complex features make the investment worthwhile. Consequently, the results demonstrate that the CNN model trained on CWT-based scalogram images achieved remarkably high classification accuracy, confirming that deep learning methods can outperform traditional ML algorithms in handling complex, non-linear, and dynamic diagnostic scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.