Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305280›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Dynamic Golf Swing Analysis Framework Based on Efficient Similarity Assessment.

Seung-Su Lee, Jun-Hyuk Choi, Jeongeun Byun, Kwang-Il Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seung-Su LeeDepartment of Embedded Systems Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Hyuk ChoiDepartment of Embedded Systems Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea.
Jeongeun ByunResearch Center for Technology Commercialization, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), Seoul 02456, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2563-4443
Kwang-Il HwangDepartment of Embedded Systems Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4196-4725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advances in computing power and deep learning, image-based pose estimation has become a viable tool for quantitative motion analysis. Compared to sensor-based systems, vision-based approaches are cost-effective, portable, and easy to deploy. However, when applied to golf swings, conventional similarity measures often fail to match expert perception, as they rely on static, frame-wise posture comparisons and require strict temporal alignment. We propose a Dynamic Motion Similarity Measurement (DMSM) framework that segments a swing into seven canonical phases-address, takeaway, half, top, impact, release, and finish-and evaluates the dynamic trajectories of joint keypoints within each phase. Unlike traditional DTW- or frame-based methods, our approach integrates continuous motion trajectories and normalizes joint coordinates to account for player body scale differences. Motion data are interpolated to improve temporal resolution, and numerical integration quantifies path differences, capturing motion flow rather than isolated postures. Quantitative experiments on side-view swing datasets show that DMSM yields stronger discrimination between same- and different-player pairs (phase-averaged separation: 0.092 vs. 0.090 for the DTW + cosine baseline) and achieves a clear biomechanical distinction in spine-angle trajectories (Δ = 38.68). Statistical analysis (paired

Indexed as

GolfAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMovementPosturedynamic swing motiongolf swing analysismotion comparisonsimilarity

Identifiers

PMID41305280
PMCPMC12656346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.