Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305266›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Outdoor Microphone Range Tests and Spectral Analysis of UAV Acoustic Signatures for Array Development.

Gabriel Jekateryńczuk, Zbigniew Piotrowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabriel JekateryńczukFaculty of Electronics, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9544-6061
Zbigniew PiotrowskiFaculty of Electronics, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3556-0297

Funding

Military University of Technology in Warsaw UGB 22-054/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic sensing is a passive and cost-effective option for unmanned aerial vehicle detection, where both signal processing and microphone hardware jointly determine field performance. In this study, we focus on the hardware front-end as a foundation for improving the reliability of subsequent DSP- or AI-based detection methods. We present a detection-focused comparison of several microphones in outdoor tests, combining calibrated range measurements with spectral analysis of real unmanned aerial vehicle emissions from three platforms. We report hardware metrics only: signal-to-noise ratio, effective detection range, attenuation slope with distance, and the low-frequency background floor. Across wind conditions and source orientations, the RØDE NTG-2 with WS6 windshield delivered the most balanced performance: in strong wind, it extended the detection range over the bare NTG-2 by approximately 31-131% (depending on azimuth), lowered the low-frequency noise floor by about 2-3 decibels, and matched or increased the wideband signal-to-noise ratio by 1.8-4.4 decibels. A parabolic NTG-2 achieved very low background noise levels at low frequencies and strong on-axis reach but proved vulnerable to gust-induced transients. Based on this evidence, we propose an eight-channel, dual-tier array of NTG-2 + WS6 elements that preserves near-hemispherical coverage and phase coherence, establishing a practical hardware baseline for outdoor acoustic unmanned aerial vehicle detection and a reproducible platform for subsequent localization and classification studies.

Indexed as

acoustic UAV detectionmicrophone arrayoutdoor field measurementsspectral analysisunmanned aerial vehicle

Identifiers

PMID41305266
PMCPMC12656299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.