Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305257›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Foot-to-Forearm Tactile Feedback for Lower-Limb Exoskeleton Control: A Pilot Benchmarking Study in Healthy Adults.

Mafalda Aguiar, Carla Pais-Vieira, Demétrio Matos, André Perrotta, Peter Kreynin, Miguel Pais-Vieira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mafalda AguiarDepartment of Physics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0002-7875-6492
Carla Pais-VieiraCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Portuguese Catholic University, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9262-0375
Demétrio MatosResearch Institute for Design, Media and Culture, Polytechnic Institute of Cávado and Ave, 4750-299 Barcelos, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4417-6115
André PerrottaCentre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra (CISUC), Department of Informatics Engineering, University of Coimbra, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2953-0585
Peter KreyninExoAtlet, 4354 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Miguel Pais-VieiraInstitute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1398-9060

Funding

European Social Fund Regional Operational Program Centro 2020European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme via an Open Call issued and executed under Project EUROBENCH (grant agreement No. 779963) Thertact-Fb and Thertact-NEXTFCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. CISUC-UID/CEC/00326/2020FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. FCT - Exploratory project 2023.11597.PEXFCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. FCT/IF/00098/2015FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. reference UIDB/04501/2020 and DOI identifier https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/04501/2020FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. reference UIDP/04501/2020 and DOI identifier https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/04501/2020FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. UIDB/04057/2020FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. UIDB/04279/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time tactile feedback has been applied in exoskeleton-based neurorehabilitation, particularly in spinal cord injury, through Foot-to-Forearm Feedback (FFF) at ground contact. Its effects on healthy individuals across varied terrains remain less understood. This pilot study investigated seven healthy participants controlling a lower-limb exoskeleton under two conditions (with and without FFF) across five scenarios: Flat, M-Shape, A-Shape, V-Shape, and Random. Objective measures included step count, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) segment length, and SIJ angle. Subjective experience was assessed by overall preference and a Global Experience Index (GEI) derived from questionnaire ratings. Analyses showed no consistent differences in step count, SIJ length, or SIJ angle between Control and FFF. In three runs, technical issues occurred (e.g., a loose cable). Subjective data showed that five of seven participants (71.4%) preferred FFF, one reported no difference, and one preferred the Control condition. Scenario-specific analyses indicated a preference for FFF in Flat (5/7 = 71.4%), but a lower preference in Random (2/6 = 33.3%). GEI scores decreased under A-Shape and Random conditions, though FFF partially mitigated the reduction in A-Shape. These preliminary findings suggest that FFF may influence subjective experience in healthy users, but confirmation will require larger samples and further investigation across scenarios.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceFeedback, SensoryFootLower ExtremityTouchAdultBenchmarkingFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePilot ProjectsYoung Adultexoskeletongait parametersrehabilitationtactile feedback

Identifiers

PMID41305257
PMCPMC12656166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.