Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305244›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Enhancing Signal and Network Integrity: Evaluating BCG Artifact Removal Techniques in Simultaneous EEG-fMRI Data.

Perihan Gülşah Gülhan, Güzin Özmen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Perihan Gülşah GülhanDepartment of Electrical Electronics Engineering, Institute of Science, Selcuk University, Konya 42130, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6749-332X
Güzin ÖzmenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Selcuk University, Konya 42075, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3007-5807

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simultaneous Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provide a powerful framework for investigating brain dynamics; however, ballistocardiogram (BCG) artifacts in EEG compromise signal quality and limit the assessment of brain connectivity. This study evaluated three widely used artifact removal methods-Average Artifact Subtraction (AAS), Optimal Basis Set (OBS), and Independent Component Analysis (ICA)-together with two hybrid approaches (AAS + ICA and OBS + ICA). Unlike previous studies that focused solely on signal-level metrics, we adopted a holistic framework that combined signal quality indicators with graph-theoretical analysis of EEG-fMRI connectivity in static and dynamic contexts. The results show that AAS provides the best signal quality, whereas OBS better preserves structural similarity. ICA, although weaker in terms of signal metrics, demonstrates sensitivity to frequency-specific patterns in dynamic graphs. Hybrid methods yield benefits, with OBS + ICA producing the lowest

Indexed as

BallistocardiographyBrainElectroencephalographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAlgorithmsArtifactsFemaleHumansMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBCG artifact removalbrain graph metricsfunctional connectivitymultimodal data analysissignal quality assessmentsimultaneous EEG-fMRI

Identifiers

PMID41305244
PMCPMC12655990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.