Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305237›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Gaussian Process-Based Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization for Optimal Calibration Point Selection.

Hua Zhuo, Jungang Ma, Mei Yang, Yikun Zhao, Lifang Yao, Yan Xu, Kun Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hua ZhuoXinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Research Institute of Measurement & Testing, Urumqi 830000, China.
Jungang MaXinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Research Institute of Measurement & Testing, Urumqi 830000, China.
Mei YangXinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Research Institute of Measurement & Testing, Urumqi 830000, China.
Yikun ZhaoXinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Research Institute of Measurement & Testing, Urumqi 830000, China.
Lifang YaoShanghai Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai 201203, China.
Yan XuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830000, China.
Kun YangCenter for Advanced Metering Infrastructure, National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China.

Funding

Special Fund for the Xinjiang Youth Top-Notch Talent Project (2023TSYCCX0109)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temperature and humidity calibration chambers, which provide controlled environments for instrument testing and validation, are widely applied in the aerospace and biomedicine fields. However, traditional fixed calibration points fail to adapt to complex operational requirements and exhibit problems including a limited coverage range and low efficiency. To address these challenges, this study develops a Gaussian Process-based Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization (GP-MFBO) framework for optimal selection of temperature and humidity calibration points. The framework integrates the following three key components: (1) a three-layer progressive multi-fidelity modeling system comprising physical analytical models, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulations, and experimental verification; (2) a systematic uncertainty quantification system covering model uncertainty, parameter uncertainty, and observation uncertainty; and (3) an adaptive acquisition function that balances uncertainty penalty mechanisms and multi-fidelity information gain evaluation. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed GP-MFBO method achieves optimal calibration point combinations with a temperature uniformity score of 0.149 and humidity uniformity score of 2.38, approaching theoretical optimal solutions within 4.5% and 3.6%, respectively. Compared to standard Gaussian process, Co-Kriging, two-stage optimization, polynomial regression, and traditional single-fidelity methods, GP-MFBO achieves uniformity score improvements of up to 81.7% and 76.3% for temperature and humidity, respectively. The prediction confidence interval coverage reaches 94.2%, outperforming all comparative methods. This research provides a rigorous theoretical foundation and technical solution for the scientific design and reliable operation of large-space temperature and humidity calibration systems.

Indexed as

calibration point selectionGaussian processmulti-fidelity Bayesian optimizationtemperature and humidity controluncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID41305237
PMCPMC12656228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.