ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Simplifying Prediction of Intended Grasp Type: Accelerometry Performs Comparably to Combined EMG-Accelerometry in Individuals With and Without Amputation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The adoption of active upper-limb prostheses with multiple degrees of freedom is largely lagging due to bulky designs and counterintuitive operation. Accurate gesture prediction with minimal sensors is key to enabling low-profile, user-friendly prosthetic devices. Wearable sensors, such as electromyography (EMG) and accelerometry (ACC) sensors, provide valuable signals for identifying patterns relating muscle activity and arm movement to specific gestures. This study investigates which sensor type (EMG or ACC) has the most valuable information to predict hand grasps and identifies the signal features contributing the most to grasp prediction performance. Using an open-source dataset, we trained two types of subject-specific classifiers (LDA & KNN) to predict 10 grasp types in 13 individuals with and 28 individuals without amputation. Having 4-fold cross-validation, LDA average accuracies using ACC only features (84.7%) were similar to combined ACC & EMG (88.3%) and much greater than with only EMG features (58.1%). Feature importance analysis showed that participants with amputation reached more than 80% accuracy using only three features, two of which were ACC-derived, while able-bodied participants required nine features, with greater reliance on EMG. These findings suggest that ACC is sufficient for robust grasp classification in individuals with amputation and can support simpler, more accessible prosthetic designs. Future work should focus on incorporating object and grip force detection alongside grasp recognition and testing model performance in real-time prosthetic control settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.