ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Non-Destructive Detection and Grading of Plum Quality Based on Multimodal Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postharvest Fruit Grading Technologies and Equipment: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Non-Destructive Detection of Internal Quality of Sanhua Plum Based on Multi-Source Information Fusion.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessing plum quality solely based on the external appearance of the peel may lead to inaccurate results. This paper proposes a multimodal data fusion technique based on deep learning, which evaluates plum quality by fusing color image data and spectral data of plums, thereby enabling plum grading. The method utilizes the Visual Geometry Group 16-layer network (VGG16) to extract plum image features, and a 1D Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN) to extract near-infrared spectral data of plums, subsequently classifying plum quality through the network's fully connected layers and output layer. Each modality independently extracts features: color images provide external color information, while visible and near-infrared spectroscopy (wavelength range 350-1700 nm) captures surface and internal chemical composition spectral properties. The multimodal preprocessing and feature extraction process creates an optimal comprehensive information representation for plum quality assessment within the feature space. By processing these integrated features through a fully connected neural network, the classification accuracy of plum quality reaches 100%, significantly outperforming single-modal methods (color imaging: 85.71%; spectroscopy: 83.33%). The performance comparison analysis between multimodal fusion and single-modal methods further confirms the robustness and applicability of the multimodal fusion approach, providing new technical means for non-destructive detection and grading of plum quality. This method can simultaneously detect internal and external quality indicators, compensating for the limitations of traditional single-dimensional detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.