ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Artificial Intelligence in Anaerobic Digestion: A Review of Sensors, Modeling Approaches, and Optimization Strategies.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reactor-Aware Machine Learning Coupled with Differential Evolution for Predicting and Optimizing Cumulative Methane Production from Agro-Industrial Waste Co-Digestion.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ammoniation of low-quality roughages for dry-season ruminant feeding: a review.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is increasingly recognized as a key technology for renewable energy generation and sustainable waste management within the circular economy. However, its performance is highly sensitive to feedstock variability and environmental fluctuations, making stable operation and high methane yields difficult to sustain. Conventional monitoring and control systems, based on limited sensors and mechanistic models, often fail to anticipate disturbances or optimize process performance. This review discusses recent progress in electrochemical, optical, spectroscopic, microbial, and hybrid sensors, highlighting their advantages and limitations in artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted monitoring. The role of soft sensors, data preprocessing, feature engineering, and explainable AI is emphasized to enable predictive and adaptive process control. Various machine learning (ML) techniques, including neural networks, support vector machines, ensemble methods, and hybrid gray-box models, are evaluated for yield forecasting, anomaly detection, and operational optimization. Persistent challenges include sensor fouling, calibration drift, and the lack of standardized open datasets. Emerging strategies such as digital twins, data augmentation, and automated optimization frameworks are proposed to address these issues. Future progress will rely on more robust sensors, shared datasets, and interpretable AI tools to achieve predictive, transparent, and efficient biogas production supporting the energy transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.