ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Real-Time and Fully Automated Robotic Stacking System with Deep Learning-Based Visual Perception.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a fully automated, real-time robotic stacking system based on deep learning-driven visual perception, designed to optimize classification and handling tasks on industrial production lines. The proposed system integrates a YOLOv5s-based object detection algorithm with an ABB IRB6640 robotic arm via a programmable logic controller and the Profinet communication protocol. Using a camera mounted above a conveyor belt and a Python-based interface, 13 different types of industrial bags were classified and sorted. The trained model achieved a high validation performance with an mAP@0.5 score of 0.99 and demonstrated 99.08% classification accuracy in initial field tests. Following environmental and mechanical optimizations, such as adjustments to lighting, camera angle, and cylinder alignment, the system reached 100% operational accuracy during real-world applications involving 9600 packages over five days. With an average cycle time of 10-11 s, the system supports a processing capacity of up to six items per minute, exhibiting robustness, adaptability, and real-time performance. This integration of computer vision, robotics, and industrial automation offers a scalable solution for future smart manufacturing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.