ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Adaptive Label Refinement Network for Domain Generalization in Compound Fault Diagnosis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Explainable Intelligent Fault Diagnosis for Rotating Machinery via Multi-Source Information Fusion Under Noisy Environments and Small Sample Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Domain generalization (DG) aims to develop models that perform robustly on unseen target domains, a critical but challenging objective for real-world fault diagnosis. The challenge is further complicated in compound fault diagnosis, where the rigidity of hard labels and the simplicity of label smoothing under-represent inter-class relations and compositional structures, degrading cross-domain robustness. While current domain generalization methods can alleviate these issues, they typically rely on multi-source domain data. However, considering the limitations of equipment operational conditions and data acquisition costs in industrial applications, only one or two independently distributed source datasets are typically available. In this work, an adaptive label refinement network (ALRN) was designed for learning with imperfect labels under source-scarce conditions. Compared to hard labels and label smoothing, ALRN learns richer, more robust soft labels that encode the semantic similarities between fault classes. The model first trains a convolutional neural network (CNN) to obtain initial class probabilities. It then iteratively refines the training labels by computing a weighted average of predictions within each class, using the sample-wise cross-entropy loss as an adaptive weighting factor. Furthermore, a label refinement stability coefficient based on the max-min Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence ratio across classes is proposed to evaluate label quality and determine when to terminate the refinement iterations. With only one or two source domains for training, ALRN achieves accuracy gains exceeding 22% under unseen operating conditions compared with a conventional CNN baseline. These results validate that the proposed label refinement algorithm can effectively enhance the cross-domain diagnostic performance, providing a novel and practical solution for learning with imperfect supervision in cross-domain compound fault diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.