ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advancing Medical Training with Mixed Reality and Haptic Feedback Simulator for Acupuncture Needling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional acupuncture training often lacks consistent, objective feedback, while current extended reality (XR) solutions rarely include quantitative assessment. This study developed and evaluated a feedback-enabled mixed reality (MR) acupuncture simulator to improve skill acquisition through depth-responsive guidance. The system, used on Microsoft HoloLens 2, combines a MetaHuman-based virtual patient with expert-designed acupoint geometries. It provides depth-dependent vibrotactile cues via a wearable haptic device and calculates a composite score from normalized metrics, including insertion depth, angular deviation, tip-to-center distance, and task duration. Ten participants (eight novices and two experts) performed needle tasks at LI4, LI11, and TE3 across two sessions. Mean depth error decreased from 6.41 mm to 3.58 mm, and task time from 9.29 s to 6.83 s. At LI11, beginners improved in achieved depth (16.24 ± 1.88 mm to 19.74 ± 1.23 mm), reduced angular deviation (27.83° to 15.34°), and shortened completion time (38.77 s to 13.28 s). Experts outperformed novices (69.25 ± 21.64 vs. 56.26 ± 23.37), confirming construct validity. Usability evaluation showed a mean overall score of 4.46 ± 0.51 and excellent reliability (McDonald's ω = 0.93). These results demonstrate that expert-informed scoring and depth-responsive haptic feedback substantially enhance accuracy, efficiency, and learning confidence, validating the system's technical robustness and educational readiness for clinical acupuncture training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.