Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305126›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Novel Multi-Source Image Registration of Porcine Body for Multi-Feature Detection.

Zhen Zhong, Shengfei Zhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhen ZhongSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300372, China.
Shengfei ZhiSchool of Information Technology Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin 300222, China.

Funding

Tianjin Education Commission Research Program 2023KJ194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety of animal-related agricultural products has been a hot issue. To obtain a multi-feature representation of porcine bodies for detecting their health, visible and infrared imaging is valuable for exploiting multiple images of a porcine body from different modalities. However, the direct registration of visible and infrared porcine body images can easily cause the dislocation of structural information and spatial position, due to different resolutions and spectrums of multi-source images. To overcome the problem, a novel multi-source image feature representation method based on contour angle orientation is proposed and named Gabor-Ordinal-based Contour Angle Orientation (GOCAO). Moreover, a visible and infrared porcine body image registration method is described and named GOCAO-Rough to Fine (GOCAO-R2F). First, contour and texture features of the porcine body are acquired using a Gabor filter with variable scales and an ordinal operation. Second, feature points in contours are obtained by curvature scale space (CSS), and the main orientation of each feature point is determined by GOCAO. Third, modified scale-invariant feature transform (MSIFT) features are received on the main orientation and registered with bilateral matching. Finally, accurate registrations are extracted by R2F. Experimental results show that the proposed registration algorithm accurately matches multi-source images for porcine body multi-feature detection and is capable of achieving lower average root-mean-square error than current registration algorithms.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsAnimalsSwineGabor-ordinal-based contour angle orientationmodified scale-invariant feature transformporcine body multi-feature detectionvisible and infrared image registration

Identifiers

PMID41305126
PMCPMC12656470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.