ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Accuracy Analysis of SINS/CNS Integrated Attitude Determination Based on Simplified Spatio-Temporal Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For ground-based Celestial Navigation System/Strapdown Inertial Navigation System (CNS/SINS) integrated navigation with arcsecond-level accuracy, the current spatio-temporal transformation model involves a considerable amount of astronomical knowledge, making it difficult for ordinary navigation professionals to quickly master and operate. There has been no strict argumentation on which parameters can be simplified in the calculation process. Under the premise of ensuring that the attitude accuracy of ground integrated navigation meets the requirement of 5 arcseconds, through argumentation and quantitative analysis, the complex links in the spatio-temporal transformation model that contribute minimally to the final attitude measurement accuracy can be eliminated, significantly reducing the complexity of the model and lowering the threshold for its use. The factors considered in this paper include proper motion, annual parallax, light deflection, aberration of light, details of the precession-nutation model, details of the time system, and calibration parameters. Factors contributing less than 0.1 arcsecond to the accuracy during the coordinate transformation process are ignored or approximately simplified. Error analysis shows that the corrections for annual parallax and light deflection have negligible effects on accuracy. Except for the calculation of the Earth's rotation angle, which requires a relatively precise UT1-UTC time, the time input in the calculation process of other astronomical parameters can directly use UTC time. Experimental measurements show that the calibration parameters obtained by the method in this paper have high robustness, and the parameter accuracy meets the requirements of attitude calculation. The proposed simplified spatio-temporal model reduces the computational load by 90%, can meet the arcsecond-level attitude measurement accuracy requirements of ground-based CNS/INS integrated navigation, and has the potential to be extended to more general dynamic or air/space-based intelligent navigation scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.