ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Real-Time Multi-Channel Epileptic Seizure Detection Exploiting an Ultra-Low-Complexity Algorithm-Hardware Co-Design Approach.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents an automated threshold-based multi-channel epileptic seizure detection algorithm designed for low-complexity hardware implementations. The algorithm relies on two discriminative, computationally simple time-domain features, based on power and amplitude variations, that enable accurate and timely detections due to their rapid adaptiveness to fluctuations in neural activity. To ensure long-term functionality and high sensitivity, system thresholds are optimized through an offline calibration process that exploits the statistical analysis of patient-specific inter-ictal and ictal periods. The novelty of the approach lies in its multi-channel decision-making strategy, which enhances reliability against false alarms. The proposed algorithm is tested on multiple datasets to assess its adaptability to different recording conditions, achieving roughly 98% accuracy and over 98% sensitivity on both the EEG CHB-MIT dataset and the iEEG SWEC-ETHZ dataset, with average latencies of 3.37 s and 7.84 s, respectively. These results are comparable to, and in some cases outperform, several published machine-learning-based approaches. On the hardware side, FPGA synthesis highlights the minimal and scalable resource requirements of the proposed architecture, achieved through Time-Division Multiplexing (TDM) of both filtering and feature extraction. When compared to state-of-the-art proposals, the system emerges as an ideal candidate for real-time, resource-constrained hardware implementations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.