Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305085›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Explainable Artificial Intelligence Framework for Predicting Treatment Outcomes in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Mini Han Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mini Han WangZhuhai People's Hospital (The Affiliated Hospital of Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University), Zhuhai 519000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5002-3708

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82501368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness, yet current tools for forecasting treatment outcomes remain limited by either the opacity of deep learning or the rigidity of rule-based systems. To address this gap, we propose a hybrid neuro-symbolic and large language model (LLM) framework that combines mechanistic disease knowledge with multimodal ophthalmic data for explainable AMD treatment prognosis. In a pilot cohort of ten surgically managed AMD patients (six men, four women; mean age 67.8 ± 6.3 years), we collected 30 structured clinical documents and 100 paired imaging series (optical coherence tomography, fundus fluorescein angiography, scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and ocular/superficial B-scan ultrasonography). Texts were semantically annotated and mapped to standardized ontologies, while images underwent rigorous DICOM-based quality control, lesion segmentation, and quantitative biomarker extraction. A domain-specific ophthalmic knowledge graph encoded causal disease and treatment relationships, enabling neuro-symbolic reasoning to constrain and guide neural feature learning. An LLM fine-tuned on ophthalmology literature and electronic health records ingested structured biomarkers and longitudinal clinical narratives through multimodal clinical-profile prompts, producing natural-language risk explanations with explicit evidence citations. On an independent test set, the hybrid model achieved AUROC 0.94 ± 0.03, AUPRC 0.92 ± 0.04, and a Brier score of 0.07, significantly outperforming purely neural and classical Cox regression baselines (

Indexed as

Large Language ModelsMacular DegenerationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisTreatment Outcomeage-related macular degenerationexplainable artificial intelligencelarge language model (LLM)multimodal ophthalmic imagingneuro-symbolic artificial intelligencepersonalized treatment planningprognosis

Identifiers

PMID41305085
PMCPMC12656617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.