ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Explainable Artificial Intelligence Framework for Predicting Treatment Outcomes in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Rationale-Conditioned Image-Contrast Audit of OCT Dependence in Vision-Language Models for Anti-VEGF Treatment-Response Prediction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interpreting the Black Box: Interpretable Machine Learning and Systems Pharmacology in Small-Molecule Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Explainable artificial intelligence for postoperative analgesia risk stratification and clinical decision support in abdominal surgery.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for precision therapeutics in age-related macular degeneration: current advances, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Large language model-driven time-series forecasting of financial network indicators.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Construction and Applications of Knowledge Graphs in Ophthalmology.Ophthalmic research · 2026Review
- Real‑world analysis of Macular Oedema associated with Paclitaxel Formulations using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness, yet current tools for forecasting treatment outcomes remain limited by either the opacity of deep learning or the rigidity of rule-based systems. To address this gap, we propose a hybrid neuro-symbolic and large language model (LLM) framework that combines mechanistic disease knowledge with multimodal ophthalmic data for explainable AMD treatment prognosis. In a pilot cohort of ten surgically managed AMD patients (six men, four women; mean age 67.8 ± 6.3 years), we collected 30 structured clinical documents and 100 paired imaging series (optical coherence tomography, fundus fluorescein angiography, scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and ocular/superficial B-scan ultrasonography). Texts were semantically annotated and mapped to standardized ontologies, while images underwent rigorous DICOM-based quality control, lesion segmentation, and quantitative biomarker extraction. A domain-specific ophthalmic knowledge graph encoded causal disease and treatment relationships, enabling neuro-symbolic reasoning to constrain and guide neural feature learning. An LLM fine-tuned on ophthalmology literature and electronic health records ingested structured biomarkers and longitudinal clinical narratives through multimodal clinical-profile prompts, producing natural-language risk explanations with explicit evidence citations. On an independent test set, the hybrid model achieved AUROC 0.94 ± 0.03, AUPRC 0.92 ± 0.04, and a Brier score of 0.07, significantly outperforming purely neural and classical Cox regression baselines (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.