ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using Multi-Site Ballistocardiogram with Piezoelectric Rubber Sheet Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ballistocardiography (BCG) is a noninvasive modality for detecting cardiac activity. This study developed a robust atrial fibrillation (AF) detection algorithm using multiple BCG sensors at different locations and evaluated the improvement in accuracy by combining data from multiple sensors. We recorded the BCG using a piezoelectric rubber sheet sensor and an electrocardiogram in 84 participants (29 with AF and 55 without AF) in the supine position. Four BCGs (BCG1-4) were obtained using sensors placed from the head to the lumbar region (0, 25, 45, and 65 cm from the head). The BCG signals were divided into 32 s blocks and analyzed. After applying fast Fourier transform, we input the power spectrum, focusing on frequencies below 10 Hz, into machine learning (ML) classifiers to distinguish between AF and non-AF with parameter tuning. The AdaBoost classifier for BCG2 exhibited the highest accuracy (0.88) among the ML models for each sensor. When we applied the classifier to other BCGs, it achieved accuracies of 0.92, 0.73, and 0.78 for BCG1, 3, and 4, respectively. The combined model using multiple sensors exhibited an accuracy of 0.92. The optimized model for BCG2 was robust against shifts in the sensor toward the head and lumbar directions. A combined assessment using multiple sensors improved performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.