ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Towards Wearable Respiration Monitoring: 1D-CRNN-Based Breathing Detection in Smart Textiles.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory Monitoring in Motion: An Overview of Wearable Methods and Algorithmic Approaches for Reliable Assessment.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Smart e-Textile Singlet Prototype and Concept: Multi Sensor Sensing for Geriatric Monitoring.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring respiratory activity is a key indicator of physiological health and an essential component in smart textile systems for unobtrusive vital sign assessment. In this work, we present a one-dimensional convolutional recurrent neural network (1D-CRNN) for automatic classification of breathing activity from inertial data acquired by a smart e-textile of 59 subjects. The proposed method integrates convolutional layers for local feature extraction with recurrent layers for temporal context modeling, enabling robust segmentation of breathing and noise segments. The model was trained and evaluated using a stratified five-fold cross-validation scheme to account for inter-subject variability and class imbalance. Across different window sizes, the classifier achieved a mean accuracy of 0.88 and an F1-score of 0.92 at a window size of 2000 samples. The best-performing configuration for a single fold, reached an accuracy of 0.995 and an F1-score of 0.99. Furthermore, near-real-time feasibility was demonstrated, with a total processing time-including data loading, classification, segmentation, and visualization-of only 1.76 s for a 250 s measurement, corresponding to more than 100× faster than the recording time. These results indicate that the proposed approach is highly suitable for embedded, on-device inference within wearable systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.