ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Automated EMG-Based Classification of Upper Extremity Motor Impairment Levels in Subacute Stroke.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rehabilitation of upper extremity (UE) impairments after stroke requires regular evaluation, with standard methods typically being time-consuming and relying heavily on manual assessment by therapists. In our study, we propose automating these assessments using electromyography (EMG) as a core indicator of muscle activity, correlating passive and active EMG signals with clinical motor impairment scores. UE motor function in 25 patients was evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for UE (FMA-UE), the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and the Brunnstrom Recovery Stages (BRS). EMG data were processed via feature extraction and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), with 10-fold cross-validation for binary classification based on clinical score thresholds. The LDA classifier accurately distinguished impairment categories, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) scores of 0.897 ± 0.272 for FMA-UE > 33, 0.981 ± 0.103 for FMA-UE > 44, 0.890 ± 0.262 for MAS > 0, 0.968 ± 0.130 for BRS > 3, and 0.987 ± 0.085 for BRS > 4. Notably, resting-state EMG alone yielded comparable classification performance. These findings demonstrate that EMG-driven assessments can reliably classify motor impairment levels, offering a pathway to objective clinical scoring that can streamline rehabilitation workflows, reduce therapists' manual burden, and prioritize patient recovery over assessment procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.