Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305030›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Satellite Observation Mission Resource Scheduling Based on Dynamic Coalition Algorithm.

Shijie Zhai, Tinghua Zhang, Hao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shijie ZhaiDepartment of Electronic and Optical Engineering, Space Engineering University, Beijing 101416, China.
Tinghua ZhangDepartment of Electronic and Optical Engineering, Space Engineering University, Beijing 101416, China.
Hao ChenDepartment of Electronic and Optical Engineering, Space Engineering University, Beijing 101416, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted in response to the challenges posed by the heterogeneity of ground station resources and the dynamic nature of tasks in satellite observation missions. To combat these issues, we propose a resource scheduling method based on a dynamic coalition algorithm. The method involves constructing a five-dimensional evaluation system including spatial proximity, energy sufficiency, equipment integrity, load balancing, and continuous observation capability, which is combined with an improved simulated annealing algorithm to achieve global optimization of the coalition structure. Then, an energy allocation strategy based on demand is designed to enhance system sustainability. An experiment comparing the greedy, particle swarm, genetic, and simulated annealing algorithms was conducted. The results showed that the task completion rate of the dynamic coalition algorithm reached 93.8%; the resource utilization rate was 85.7%; the energy consumption standard deviation was 18.7; and the convergence speed was 45 iterations for the proposed method. These results were significantly better than those of other algorithms used for comparison. The innovative aspects of this study include ① a dynamic energy allocation model based on normalized priority; ② a simulated annealing optimization framework with hybrid neighborhood operations; and ③ the deep integration of multi-dimensional evaluation metrics and dynamic coalition construction mechanisms. This research provides theoretical support and technical solutions for task scheduling in wireless sensor networks under complex dynamic scenarios.

Indexed as

dynamic coalition algorithmfive-dimensional evaluationresource schedulingsatellite observation missionsimulated annealing optimization

Identifiers

PMID41305030
PMCPMC12656434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.