ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluation of Pre-Applied Conductive Materials in Electrode Grids for Longterm EEG Recording.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Around the Clock: Wearing a Flex-Printed trEEGrid Electrode Patch and Miniaturized Amplifier for Nearly 24 Hours Across Daytime and Overnight EEG Sessions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Computational Comparison of AC and DC Excitation for Long-Term Electrodermal Activity (EDA) Recording Across Electrode Materials.IEEE sensors journal · 2026Article
- Advances in (Bio)Sensors for Physiological Monitoring: A Special Issue Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most long-term mobile EEG monitoring systems require professional application of the electrodes, which makes them inconvenient for everyday use. Additionally, many materials that facilitate EEG application, such as dry electrodes, may cause discomfort when worn for longer periods of time. To address these problems, we designed flex-printed EEG electrode grids (trEEGrid) and evaluated signal quality based on two pre-applied conductive materials. Self-applicable trEEGrid patches with a conductive solid hydrogel and a novel silicone-based dry material were used in a day-long (5-6 h) recording session, which included a 4 h continuous recording of impedance levels, as well as two auditory task recordings in the morning and afternoon. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), AEP morphology, and impedance levels of the conductive materials were compared to evaluate overall signal quality, and further comparisons took place between the morning and afternoon sessions to evaluate signal deterioration over time. Comparable impedance values were observed for both silicone and hydrogel materials, but the silicone material exhibited a higher outlier rate, with impedance values over 200 kΩ. Over time, the impedance values increased for the silicone material and decreased for the hydrogel material. The morphology of the AEP was reproduced comparably well with both materials, with reasonable SNRs in both the morning and the afternoon. In conclusion, when combined with flex-printed electrode grids, silicone and hydrogel materials make it feasible to collect high-quality long-term EEG signals with high wearing comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.