Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41304796›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2025

Optimizing Oral Vitamin C Supplementation: Addressing Pharmacokinetic Challenges with Nutraceutical Formulation Approaches-A Mini Review.

Tejal Dhotre, Shefali Thanawala, Rajat Shah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tejal DhotreNutriventia Private Limited., Mumbai 400069, India.
Shefali ThanawalaNutriventia Private Limited., Mumbai 400069, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6887-0772
Rajat ShahNutriventia Private Limited., Mumbai 400069, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7170-8784

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin C, a water-soluble micronutrient, is one of the most widely used dietary supplements pertaining to its vital role in maintaining overall human health, particularly through its potent antioxidant and immune-supportive functions. This mini review summarizes key pharmacokinetic constraints of vitamin C and evaluates formulation strategies aimed at improving its systemic availability. Achieving sustained optimal plasma levels of vitamin C remains challenging due to its dose-dependent absorption, tissue saturation, rapid renal clearance, and short half-life. These pharmacokinetic limitations restrict systemic retention, with high oral doses providing only marginal increases in plasma concentrations and necessitating multiple daily administrations. Conventional vitamin C supplements show efficient absorption only at low to moderate doses, while higher intakes are restricted by transporter saturation and increased renal excretion. Alternative delivery systems such as liposomal encapsulation, esterified derivatives, nano-emulsions, and co-formulations with bioenhancers have been examined; however, evidence for prolonged systemic retention remains inconsistent. The sustained-release formulation of vitamin C shows more reliable outcomes, demonstrating prolonged plasma exposure, higher steady-state concentrations, and potential for improved compliance through reduced dosing frequency. While further robust comparative studies are needed, current evidence suggest that advanced formulation approaches, particularly sustained-release delivery, may help overcome these pharmacokinetic limitations, thereby supporting improved clinical utility of vitamin C supplementation.

Indexed as

ascorbic acidpharmacokineticplasma exposurerenal excretionsustained-releasesystemic retention

Identifiers

PMID41304796
PMCPMC12655283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.