ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Comparative Stability of Synthetic and Natural Polymeric Micelles in Physiological Environments: Implications for Drug Delivery.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supramolecular Degraders: An Emerging Paradigm in Targeted Protein Degradation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Fibrin-Binding Peptide-Functionalized HBiomedicines · 2026Article
- Bufalin-Loaded Multifunctional Nanodrugs for Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Delivery Strategies, and Translational Perspectives.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Bridging the Lab-to-Clinic Gap in Intranasal Nanomaterial-Based Chemotherapy for Glioblastoma.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Polymeric Micelle Systems for Oral Drug Delivery of Small Molecule Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Biomimetic Targeted Drug Delivery for Liver Failure in Abdominal Sepsis: Focus on Autologous Erythrocyte Ghosts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymeric micelles are widely studied as nanocarriers for hydrophobic drugs, yet their structural stability under physiological conditions remains a major limitation. This review provides a comparative evaluation of synthetic and natural polymeric micelles with a focus on their stability under dilution and in protein-rich environments. The discussion integrates thermodynamic and kinetic factors governing micelle integrity and examines how molecular composition, hydrophobic segment length, and core-shell modifications influence disintegration behavior. While synthetic micelles commonly collapse below their critical micelle concentration during intravenous administration, natural polymeric micelles, such as those derived from chitosan, alginate, or heparin, exhibit improved resistance to dilution but remain vulnerable to protein-induced destabilization. Strategies such as core or shell cross-linking, surface functionalization, and natural polymer coatings are reviewed as promising approaches to enhance circulation stability and controlled drug release. The work provides a framework for designing micellar systems with balanced biocompatibility, biodegradability, and robustness suitable for clinical drug-delivery applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.