ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Base and Prime Editing for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Delivery Platforms, Safety, Efficacy, and Translational Perspectives.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotypic features of EYS-associated retinitis pigmentosa with the c.2528 G > A (p.Gly843Glu) mutation in a Japanese cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Targeted Gene and Genome-Editing Strategies for Epilepsy: Experimental Advances and Translational Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous spectrum of disorders that lead to progressive and irreversible vision loss. Gene therapy is the most promising emerging treatment for IRDs. While gene augmentation strategies have demonstrated clinical benefit and results within the first approved ocular gene therapy, their application is restricted by adeno-associated virus (AAV) packaging capacity and limited efficacy for dominant mutations. Recent breakthroughs in precision genome editing, particularly base editing (BE) and prime editing (PE), have provided alternatives capable of directly correcting pathogenic variants. BE enables targeted single-nucleotide conversions, whereas PE further allows for precise insertions and deletions, both circumventing the double-strand DNA cleavage or repair processes typically induced by conventional CRISPR-Cas editing systems, thereby offering advantages in post-mitotic retinal cells. Preclinical investigations across murine and non-human primate models have demonstrated the feasibility, molecular accuracy, and preliminary safety profiles of these platforms in targeting IRD-associated mutations. However, critical challenges remain before clinical application can be realized, including limited editing efficiency in photoreceptors, interspecies variability in therapeutic response, potential risks of off-target effects, and barriers in large-scale vector manufacturing. Moreover, the delivery of genome editors to the outer retina remains suboptimal, prompting intensive efforts in capsid engineering and the development of non-viral delivery systems. This review synthesizes the current progress in BE and PE optimization, highlights innovations in delivery platforms that encompass viral and emerging non-viral systems and summarizes the major barriers to clinical translation. We further discuss AI-driven strategies for the rational design of BE/PE systems, thereby outlining their future potential and perspectives in the treatment of IRDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.