Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41304743›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2025

Base and Prime Editing for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Delivery Platforms, Safety, Efficacy, and Translational Perspectives.

Haoliang Zhang, Yuxuan Li, Jiajie Li, Xiaosa Li, Tong Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haoliang ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.ORCID 0009-0006-8154-1192
Yuxuan LiSchool of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China.
Jiajie LiSchool of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0009-0009-4750-6117
Xiaosa LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Tong LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2544-1254

Funding

he National Natural Science Foundation of China U22A20311Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 23J41900200Shanghai "Rising Stars of Medical Talents" Youth Development Program SHWSRS(2025)_071the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82388101the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82571246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous spectrum of disorders that lead to progressive and irreversible vision loss. Gene therapy is the most promising emerging treatment for IRDs. While gene augmentation strategies have demonstrated clinical benefit and results within the first approved ocular gene therapy, their application is restricted by adeno-associated virus (AAV) packaging capacity and limited efficacy for dominant mutations. Recent breakthroughs in precision genome editing, particularly base editing (BE) and prime editing (PE), have provided alternatives capable of directly correcting pathogenic variants. BE enables targeted single-nucleotide conversions, whereas PE further allows for precise insertions and deletions, both circumventing the double-strand DNA cleavage or repair processes typically induced by conventional CRISPR-Cas editing systems, thereby offering advantages in post-mitotic retinal cells. Preclinical investigations across murine and non-human primate models have demonstrated the feasibility, molecular accuracy, and preliminary safety profiles of these platforms in targeting IRD-associated mutations. However, critical challenges remain before clinical application can be realized, including limited editing efficiency in photoreceptors, interspecies variability in therapeutic response, potential risks of off-target effects, and barriers in large-scale vector manufacturing. Moreover, the delivery of genome editors to the outer retina remains suboptimal, prompting intensive efforts in capsid engineering and the development of non-viral delivery systems. This review synthesizes the current progress in BE and PE optimization, highlights innovations in delivery platforms that encompass viral and emerging non-viral systems and summarizes the major barriers to clinical translation. We further discuss AI-driven strategies for the rational design of BE/PE systems, thereby outlining their future potential and perspectives in the treatment of IRDs.

Indexed as

AI-driven system designbase editingclinical translation challengesgene delivery systemgene editinggene therapyinherited retinal diseasesprime editing

Identifiers

PMID41304743
PMCPMC12655462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.