ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Three-Dimensional Printing in Paediatrics: Innovative Technology for Manufacturing Patient-Centred Drug Delivery Systems.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional printing as a transformative platform for patient-centric pediatric drug delivery: technologies, formulation strategies and clinical translation.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Review
- Quality by Design and Process Analytical Technology for On-Demand Drug Manufacturing Through 3D Printing.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing can be regarded as a game-changing approach for paediatric drug development, as children have special drug-related requirements which are rarely met by conventional technologies. Traditional dosage forms have considerable drawbacks, among them dose, excipient safety, and taste issues, which can be resolved by using three-dimensional (3D) printing. Ease of swallowing and an appealing design are among the improvements brought forth by 3D printing techniques. Techniques that have been thoroughly researched in the paediatric field include hot-melt extrusion (HME) coupled with fused deposition modelling (FDM), direct powder extrusion (DPE) and semisolid extrusion (SSE) 3D printing. Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) 3D bioprinting and binder-jet (BJ) 3D printing are other less known but highly useful techniques. A number of studies focus on significant subjects for the paediatric medicine domain, such as the acceptability of the produced formulations, the size of tablets, the design, the concealment of bitter API flavour, and the stability of the dosage forms. The 3D-printed oral formulations are varied: conventional-sized tablets, miniaturised tablets, chewable tablets, and orodispersible films or tablets. Most of the drugs used in the presented studies are essential medicines for children, for which commercial products with flexible doses and age-appropriate characteristics are often lacking. The practical implications of currently published studies and future directions for paediatric pharmaceutical 3D printing are described. Although there is a substantial amount of technical and in vitro data as well as paediatric engagement work on this subject, its translation into clinical practice is still limited. The clinical efficacy of 3D-printed dosage forms has to be further researched, since only a few studies have targeted this aspect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.