ArticlePolymers2025
Reusable 3D-Printed Thermoplastic Polyurethane Honeycombs for Mechanical Energy Absorption.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Additively Manufactured Polymeric Structures for Mechanical Energy Absorption.Polymers · 2026Review
- Performance Design of Bio-Inspired Arc-Circular Honeycombs Under In-Plane Loading.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we investigate the mechanical energy absorption performance of reusable 3D-printed honeycomb structures fabricated using fused deposition modeling with three thermoplastic polyurethane variants: TPU 70A, TPU 85A, and TPU 95A. Prior to manufacturing, the mechanical properties of the TPU filaments were analyzed as a function of printing temperature to optimize tensile strength and layer adhesion. Four honeycomb configurations, including hexagonal and circular cell geometries, both with and without a 30° twist, were subjected to out-of-plane compression testing to evaluate energy absorption efficiency, specific energy absorption, and crushing load efficiency. The highest energy absorption efficiency, 47%, was achieved by the hexagonal honeycomb structure fabricated from TPU 95A, surpassing the expected values for expanded polystyrene and approaching the performance reported for high-cost advanced lattice structures. Additionally, twisted honeycomb configurations exhibited improved crushing load efficiency values (up to 73.5%), indicating better stress distribution and enhanced reusability. Despite variations in absorbed energy, TPU 95A demonstrated the best balance of elasticity, structural integrity, and reusability across multiple compression cycles. These findings suggest that TPU-based honeycomb structures could provide a viable, cost-effective alternative for energy-absorbing applications in impact protection systems, automotive safety, and sports equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.