ArticlePolymers2025
Effect of Drying Methods on the Morphological and Functional Properties of Cellulose Ester Films.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Furcellaran/Xanthan Gum/Beeswax Composite Films Containing Spirulina via High-Shear Homogenisation: Structural and Physicochemical Properties.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents the synthesis and characterisation of cellulose long chain fatty acid ester films using a novel distillable ionic liquid (IL), 5-methyl-1,5,7-triaza-bicyclo-[4.3.0] non-6-enium acetate [mTBNH][OAc] in combination with DMSO as a cosolvent. The cellulose esters cellulose diacetate (CDA), cellulose laurate (CL), and cellulose palmitate (CP) were fabricated through an evaporation-induced phase separation method (EIPS) and dried under two conditions: conventional oven drying (RO) and vacuum oven drying (VO). The influence of drying conditions on the structural, thermal, and surface properties of the films was evaluated using XRD, TGA, SEM, AFM, and contact angle measurement techniques. XRD confirmed an amorphous structure in all films, with no significant effect on the drying conditions. TGA revealed consistent thermal degradation profiles across all samples, with ester group decomposition accruing between 140 and 250 °C and main cellulose backbone degradation near 350 °C. The SEM cross-section showed a uniform film, devoid of cavities and layered structures. AFM analysis demonstrated that VO-dried films had smoother surfaces compared to RO-dried films, correlating with increased contact angles and enhanced hydrophobicity. A strong inverse relationship between surface roughness and hydrophobicity was observed, particularly in VO-dried samples, although this was not statistically significant due to data variability. Overall, the drying method had minimal impact on the internal structure and thermal stability; it significantly influenced surface morphology and wettability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.