ArticlePolymers2025
Optimizing the Cement Rheology and Hydrophobicity Using Polycarboxylate Ether (PCE)-Based Grinding Aids.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Newly developed polymer-based grinding chemicals demonstrate superior dispersion, grinding, and strength outcomes compared to traditional amine-based additives. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms underlying the improved performance of polymers in the grinding process. It examines the influence of polymer-based grinding aids (A1-A2-A3) on the hydrophobicity and rheological behavior of CEM I 42.5 R Portland cement. A systematic analysis was conducted using six different grinding aids, comprising three synthesized polycarboxylate ether (PCE)-based polymers and three commercial amine group products. Key properties, including surface tension, hydrophobicity (water contact angle, WCA), slump flow, FT-IR, and rheological parameters, were evaluated. Among the compounds tested, the A2 polymer exhibited the most favorable performance, achieving a high contact angle (131.7°), low surface tension (56.7 dyn/cm), and enhanced mortar fluidity (25 cm slump flow). FT-IR spectroscopy confirmed strong interactions between A2 and cement particles, particularly in the CH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.