ArticlePolymers2025
Additive Manufacturing of Bead-Chain-Shaped Scaffolds with AI-Based Process Optimization.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance Design of Bio-Inspired Arc-Circular Honeycombs Under In-Plane Loading.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scaffolds are widely recognized as implantable alternatives in the field of tissue engineering. Among various scaffold structures, grid structures are commonly used due to their simple design and ease of fabrication. However, grid structures have a critical demerit of low mechanical stiffness compared to its own mechanical property (used material's compressive stiffness), as the limited contact area between strands prevents effective load distribution. Several structural designs, such as triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS), modified honeycomb, and Kagome structures, have been proposed to improve compressive stiffness. Despite their mechanical advantages, these structures are limited by complex design and manufacturing processes. In this study, we propose a Bead-Chain-Shaped (BCS) scaffold, which maintains the simplicity of grid structures while enhancing compressive stiffness through the printing process alone. To optimize the printing process and enhance fabrication efficiency, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based process optimization model that correlates printing parameters (pressure, printing speed, and delay time) with the resulting geometric accuracy while maintaining the designed geometry, and predicts the optimal printing conditions for the predesigned Bead-Chain-shaped (BCS) geometry. The model was then used to extract these optimal printing conditions, enabling precise dimensional control and improving overall fabrication accuracy of the Bead-Chain-Shaped (BCS) scaffold dimensions. Under the optimized printing conditions, the BCS scaffolds achieved compressive stiffness values of 61.8, 75.9, and 91.6 MPa for BCS 5545, 6040, and 6535, respectively, corresponding to increases of 11.9%, 37.3, and 65.7% compared to the control scaffold (55.3 MPa). Numerical analysis confirmed that compressive stiffness increases as strand-to-strand contact area increases. Furthermore, in vitro cell proliferation assays demonstrated no significant difference in cell proliferation compared to conventional structures (grid-structure scaffold), indicating that the proposed design does not inhibit cellular growth. These results highlight the potential of the proposed Bead-Chain-Shaped (BCS) scaffold as a promising candidate for bone tissue engineering, offering both enhanced mechanical stiffness and fabrication efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.