Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41304231›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2025

Key Challenges in Plant Microbiome Research in the Next Decade.

Ayomide Emmanuel Fadiji, Adegboyega Adeniji, Adedayo Ayodeji Lanrewaju, Afeez Adesina Adedayo, Chinenyenwa Fortune Chukwuneme, Blessing Chidinma Nwachukwu, Joshua Aderibigbe, Iyabo Olunike Omomowo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Functional and ecological characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ayomide Emmanuel FadijiHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2753, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2893-6658
Adegboyega AdenijiState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing 100193, China.
Adedayo Ayodeji LanrewajuDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, Faculty of Applied Science, Durban University of Technology, P.O. Box 1334, Durban 4000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6093-8090
Afeez Adesina AdedayoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, University Circle, Macomb, IL 61455-4454, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-2877
Chinenyenwa Fortune ChukwunemeDepartment of Life and Consumer Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Rooderpoort 1710, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3995-208X
Blessing Chidinma NwachukwuFood Security and Safety Focus Area, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5302-1882
Joshua AderibigbeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Abuja, Abuja 900105, Nigeria.
Iyabo Olunike OmomowoDepartment of Pure and Applied Biology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso 210214, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plant microbiome is pivotal to sustainable agriculture and global food security, yet some challenges hinder fully harnessing it for field-scale impact. These challenges span measurement and integration, ecological predictability and translation across environments and seasons. Key obstacles include technical challenges, notably overcoming the limits of current sequencing for low-abundance taxa and whole-community coverage, integrating multi-omics data to uncover functional traits, addressing spatiotemporal variability in microbial dynamics, deciphering the interplay between plant genotypes and microbial communities, and enforcing standardized controls, metadata, depth targets and reproducible workflows. The rise of synthetic biology, omics tools, and artificial intelligence offers promising avenues for engineering plant-microbe interactions, yet their adoption requires regulatory, ethical, and scalability issues alongside clear economic viability for end-users and explicit accounting for evolutionary dynamics, including microbial adaptation and horizontal gene transfer to ensure durability. Furthermore, there is a need to translate research findings into field-ready applications that are validated across various soils, genotypes, and climates, while ensuring that advances benefit diverse regions through global, interdisciplinary collaboration, fair access, and benefit-sharing. Therefore, this review synthesizes current barriers and promising experimental and computational strategies to advance plant microbiome research. Consequently, a roadmap for fostering resilient, climate-smart, and resource-efficient agricultural systems focused on benchmarked, field-validated workflows is proposed.

Indexed as

environmental resilienceglobal food securitymicrobial complexitymulti-omics integrationsustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID41304231
PMCPMC12654229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.