ArticleMicroorganisms2025
Dimensional Accuracy of a Sterilized and Disinfected 3D-Printed Surgical Guide: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of surgical guides, there is no universal sterilization protocol. Surgical guides are often designed for single use, but can become contaminated, which increases the risks of infection and implant failure. This study evaluates the effects of alcohol immersion, alcohol spray, low temperature, and steam sterilization on the dimensional stability of surgical guides to ensure accurate implant placement and reduce failure. One standard dental model was scanned using a laboratory scanner. Ninety guides were printed and were then divided into six groups allocated as control, alcohol spray, alcohol immersion with ultrasonication, low-temperature dry sterilization, and two autoclave methods. Specimens were stored in dry-dark media and scanned at 0, 3, and 7 days, with dimensional changes assessed using CloudCompare. The Shapiro-Wilk, Levene's, Repeated measures one-way ANOVA, and Tukey's post hoc tests were used to determine statistical differences. Time significantly affects stability, with RMS values improving over time. Autoclave 121 °C and low-temperature 54 °C sterilization showed the lowest RMS values, indicating better stability. Within the limitations of the present study, the most effective approach for maintaining the dimensional stability of surgical guides was autoclaving at 121 °C, +1 bar for 20 min, and the second-best technique was low-temperature dry sterilization at 54 °C for 1 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.