Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41304093›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Application of Response Surface Methodology for Modeling and Optimization of the Top Surface Ironing Process in Parts Produced by MEX 3D Printing.

Andrzej Matras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrzej MatrasDepartment of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9918-9733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study analyzes the influence of material extrusion (MEX) 3D printing and ironing parameters on parts made of polylactic acid (PLA), such as top surface roughness and flatness. Surface ironing is one of the post-processing methods. It is an interesting alternative to the most commonly used mechanical or chemical treatments. It does not require the use of any additional devices or substances; however, it can only be used on flat surfaces, requires additional time for application, and a flush may form at the edges of the ironed surface. The Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was used for modeling the analyzed processes. The presented methodology assumes a two-stage approach. First, the printing process of the top surface is optimized. Then, the ironing of the top surface is optimized. Improvement of surface roughness and flatness was adopted as the optimization criterion. The influence of extruder temperature, printing speed, and filament flow used during printing of the top surface, as well as extruder temperature, ironing speed, and distance between passes used during ironing, was examined. The significance of the influence of the analyzed parameters was determined using ANOVA and Pareto diagrams. The use of the applied research methodology and created mathematical models allows for determining the relationship between the optimal extruder temperature, extrusion flow, speed, and distance between passes during ironing while ensuring high process efficiency. The ironing resulted in a fivefold reduction in the Ra and an eightfold reduction in the FLTq parameters. A surface with Ra = 1.09 μm and FLTq = 3.4 μm was obtained.

Indexed as

3D printingironingmaterial extrusionpolylactic acidprocess efficiencyResponse Surface Methodologysurface flatnesssurface roughness

Identifiers

PMID41304093
PMCPMC12654499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.