ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Quantitative Depth Estimation in Lock-In Thermography: Modeling and Correction of Lateral Heat Conduction Effects.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lock-in thermography is a widely used nondestructive testing technique for detecting subsurface defects in solid materials. In this study, one-dimensional analytical modeling and three-dimensional finite element simulations were combined to elucidate how lateral heat conduction influences quantitative depth estimation in titanium alloy material using two inversion strategies: the blind frequency method and the phase difference method. Parametric analyses were conducted for defect radius-to-depth ratios ranging from 0.5 to 8 under various excitation frequencies. Results show that the blind frequency method can significantly underestimate defect depth with errors of up to 20.7% when the radius-to-depth ratio is as small as 0.5. To mitigate this bias, an exponential correction model was developed to compensate for lateral conduction effects, reducing the error to within ±5%. The accuracy of the phase difference method is found to depend jointly on defect depth, excitation frequency, and the ratio of defect radius to thermal diffusion length; estimation errors become negligible when this ratio exceeds 3. The novelty of this work lies in identifying lateral conduction as a key bias source and establishing a quantitative correction framework for the depth inversion based on the blind frequency method. The proposed approach is expected to enhance the accuracy of quantitative thermography for engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.