ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Research on Mixing Uniformity Evaluation and Molding Method for Crumb Rubber Asphalt Mixtures.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The broader adoption of crumb rubber asphalt mixtures (CRAM) as sustainable pavement materials is currently limited by two key technical barriers. Firstly, there is a lack of standardized methods to evaluate mixing uniformity. Secondly, the material's tendency for elastic recovery after compaction remains problematic. These barriers ultimately hinder the realization of CRAM's full potential in vibration reduction, noise abatement, and resource recycling. To improve the performance evaluation system of CRAM and promote its development in engineering applications. Based on the distribution characteristics of crumb rubber in asphalt mixtures, this study established a crumb rubber distribution area moment model. It proposed a coefficient of area-distance variation to evaluate the mixing uniformity of CRAM. Through compaction tests and orthogonal tests, the effects of mixing process, mixing time, mixing temperature, compaction temperature, compaction times, and compaction method on the mixing uniformity and performance of CRAM are systematically investigated. The results show that, compared with specimens prepared by single compaction and compaction after high-temperature curing, CRAM specimens prepared by secondary compaction exhibit superior mechanical performance. The 24 h elastic recovery rate of these specimens is reduced to 24% of that in single-compacted specimens. The mixing process and mixing time have a significant impact on the mixing uniformity of CRAM. Pre-mixing crumb rubber with aggregates or extending the mixing time can improve the CRAM mixing uniformity by 45% and 18%, respectively. The mixing and compaction temperatures primarily affect the bulk density and Marshall stability of the specimens. When the mixing and compaction temperatures are 180 °C and 170 °C, respectively, the bulk density and Marshall stability of the molded specimens reach their maximum values. Through orthogonal analysis, the optimal mixing method for CRAM is determined as follows: mix aggregates and crumb rubber at 180 °C for 40 s, then add asphalt and continue mixing for another 80 s. The optimal process for secondary compaction is as follows: the first compaction at 170 °C, compacting each side 47 times, and the second compaction at 80 °C, compacting each side 23 times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.