ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of Membrane-Assisted Regenerative Therapy in Peri-Implantitis Management: A Comprehensive Review Incorporating Systematic Review Evidence.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research advances in early diagnosis and treatment strategies for peri-implantitis: from microecology to regenerative therapy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peri-implantitis (PI) is characterized by inflammatory tissue destruction and alveolar bone loss surrounding dental implants, posing clinical challenges. To promote bone regeneration, clinicians often use resorbable or non-resorbable membranes in combination with bone grafts or biologic agents. Despite their widespread application in PI management, the clinical efficacy of these approaches remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the role of membrane-assisted regenerative therapy in the management of PI. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines, with the protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251089276). Sixty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The primary outcomes assessed were bone-fill gain and reduction in probing pocket depth (PPD). Although some studies reported improved bone-fill and PPD reduction with membrane-assisted regenerative therapy, the findings were not consistently significant. Future research should validate the clinical efficacy of membranes through well-designed randomized trials and develop advanced decontamination techniques and implant surface modifications that could enhance treatment predictability and patient outcomes. Overall, while membranes show potential clinical value in regenerative therapy, their necessity remains uncertain owing to variability in the current evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.