ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development and Implementation of a Defect Detection Model for Microstructures Using Image Processing Methods.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this research is to develop and implement artificial intelligence models for the automatic detection of defects in the microstructures of austempered ductile iron (ADI). Our research used three different approaches, representing various categories of machine learning tasks: image classification (ResNet), pixel-wise segmentation (UNet), and object detection (YOLO). Each of the models were adapted to the specific characteristics of the dataset and tested on a collection of microstructural images prepared within the scope of the research. The data preparation process included clustering using the k-means method, morphological operations, generation of binary masks, conversion of labels into formats required by each architecture, and data augmentation to increase the diversity of training samples. The results demonstrated that ResNet achieved very high classification accuracy but did not provide spatial information about defect localization. UNet produced precise segmentation masks of martensitic regions, allowing for quantitative analysis of samples, although it required significantly higher computational resources and struggled with detecting very small defects. YOLO, in turn, enabled fast detection of defects in the form of bounding boxes. In summary, each model proved effective in a different context: ResNet for preliminary classification, UNet for detailed laboratory analysis, and YOLO for industrial detection tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.