ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Residual Flexural Strength of Concrete Reinforced with Recycled Carbon Fibers from Wind Turbine Blades.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The study aims to assess the potential of recycled carbon fibers recovered from end-of-life wind turbine blades as a sustainable reinforcement material for concrete and to establish correlations between fiber parameters and the mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced concrete. The research focuses on how fiber length, content, and cement type affect the residual flexural strength and cracking behavior of FRC. The experimental program included 48 concrete mix series with varying fibre lengths (25, 38, and 50 mm), dosages (0, 2, 4, and 8 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.