Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41304030›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Enhancing the Performance of FFF-Printed Parts: A Review of Reinforcement and Modification Strategies for Thermoplastic Polymers.

Jakub Leśniowski, Adam Stawiarski, Marek Barski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jakub LeśniowskiLaboratory of Techno-Climatic Research and Heavy Duty Machines, CUT Doctoral School, Faculty of Mechanical Engienering, Cracow University of Technology, Al. Jana Pawła II 37, 31-864 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0009-0003-5529-2944
Adam StawiarskiDepartment of Machine Design and Composite Structure, Faculty of Mechanical Engienering, Cracow University of Technology, Al. Jana Pawła II 37, 31-864 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5700-4841
Marek BarskiDepartment of Machine Design and Composite Structure, Faculty of Mechanical Engienering, Cracow University of Technology, Al. Jana Pawła II 37, 31-864 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2247-5846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The technology of 3D printing has become one of the most effective methods of creating various parts, such as those used for fast prototyping. The most important aspect of 3D printing is the selection and application of the appropriate material, also known as filament. The current review concerns mainly the description of the mechanical and physical properties of the different filaments and the possibilities of improving those properties. The review begins with a short description of the development of 3D printing technology. Next, the basic characteristics of thermoplastics used in the fused filament fabrication (FFF) are discussed, namely polylactic acid (PLA), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG). According to modern concepts, the printed parts can be reinforced with the use of different kinds of fibers, namely synthetic fibers (carbon, glass, aramid) or natural fibers (wood, flax, hemp, jute). Thus, the impact of such a reinforcement on the performance of FFF composites is also presented. The current review, unlike other works, primarily addresses the problem of the aging of parts made from the thermoplastics above. Environmental conditions, including UV radiation, can drastically reduce the physical and mechanical properties of printed elements. Moreover, the current review contains a detailed discussion about the influence of the different fibers on the final mechanical properties of the printed elements. Generally, the synthetic fibers improve the mechanical performance, with documented increases in tensile modulus reaching, for instance, 700% for carbon-fiber-reinforced ABS or over 15-fold for continuous aramid composites, enabling their use in functional, load-bearing components. In contrast, the natural ones could even decrease the stiffness and strength (e.g., wood-plastic composites), or, as in the case of flax, significantly increase stiffness (by 88-121%) while offering a sustainable, lightweight alternative for non-structural applications.

Indexed as

3D printingABSfiber reinforcementfused filament fabricationPETGPLA

Identifiers

PMID41304030
PMCPMC12654491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.