Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41303988›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Influence of the Upholstery Textiles Structure on Their Functional Properties.

Justyna Pinkos, Adam K Puszkarz, Jacek Rutkowski, Martyna Borowińska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justyna PinkosInstitute of Architecture of Textiles, Faculty of Textiles and Design, Lodz University of Technology, 116 Żeromskiego Street, 90-924 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1873-7847
Adam K PuszkarzTextile Institute, Faculty of Textiles and Design, Lodz University of Technology, 116 Żeromskiego Street, 90-924 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1765-9093
Jacek RutkowskiTextile Institute, Faculty of Textiles and Design, Lodz University of Technology, 116 Żeromskiego Street, 90-924 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9775-0187
Martyna BorowińskaInstitute of Architecture of Textiles, Faculty of Textiles and Design, Lodz University of Technology, 116 Żeromskiego Street, 90-924 Lodz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article evaluates selected performance parameters of commercial upholstery textiles that impact on user comfort and safety. The study included four commercial multilayer textiles: RIBCORD bright, RIBCORD dark, OREO, and ILIAS, each with varying morphology (thickness, number of layers, porosity, and raw material composition). Statistical analysis of the textile microstructure was conducted using high-resolution micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). The performance parameters of the textiles were determined based on tests of air permeability, tensile strength, abrasion and pilling resistance, and flammability. The significantly different results obtained for all performance parameters of the tested textiles are justified by the results of the microstructure analysis. A clear correlation was observed between air permeability and the porosity of the inner layer of all tested textiles. Tensile strength tests revealed significant mechanical anisotropy in all textiles. Abrasion and pilling resistance tests demonstrated very good properties for RIBCORD bright, RIBCORD dark, and OREO. Flammability tests have shown that OREO is a flame-retardant textile material.

Indexed as

abrasionair permeabilityflammabilityknitted fabricmicro-CTpillingtensile strengthupholstery textileswoven fabric

Identifiers

PMID41303988
PMCPMC12654245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.