Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41303979›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Adsorptive Removal of Arsenite and Cobalt by Commercial Sorbents.

Sevda Joudiazar, Sushma Yadav, Zhiming Zhang, Anshuman Satpathy, Eustace Fernando, Roxana Rahmati, Junchul Kim, Rupali Datta, Dibyendu Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sevda JoudiazarDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-4568-4598
Sushma YadavDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1476-2028
Zhiming ZhangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4472-7653
Anshuman SatpathyDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
Eustace FernandoDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4877-0306
Roxana RahmatiDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-0266-4593
Junchul KimTetra Tech, Inc., King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA.
Rupali DattaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4117-0511
Dibyendu SarkarDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1978-1276

Funding

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through Tetra Tech, Inc. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the prevalence and toxicity of heavy metals in the environment, arsenic and cobalt are of particular concern due to their high mobility and bioaccumulation potential, particularly in contaminated groundwater. Herein, we studied the adsorption behavior of commercially available sorbents, including Fluorosorb-100 (FS-100), Fluorosorb-200 (FS-200), and Filtrasorb-400 (F-400), for the removal of arsenite (As(III)) and cobalt (Co(II)), aiming at the selection of filter media in terms of future groundwater remediation. Kinetic analysis revealed that As(III) adsorption followed a pseudo-second-order model, while Co(II) showed mixed first- and second-order behavior, reflecting sorbent-dependent mechanisms. Equilibrium isotherm modeling revealed strong correlations with both Langmuir and Freundlich models, confirming heterogeneous adsorption sites and multilayer interactions. FS-100 demonstrated the highest affinity for As(III) (qₘ = 0.46 mg/g) and F-400 exhibited the greatest adsorption capacity for Co(II) (qₘ = 1.00 mg/g), while FS-200 consistently showed relatively weaker adsorption for both metals. Desorption studies indicated predominantly irreversible binding, with minimal release of As(III) from F-400 and Co(II) from FS-200 and F-400, even at high concentrations. Overall, these findings highlight that commercially available sorbents can effectively capture arsenite and cobalt, offering cost-effective and scalable options for heavy-metal removal in groundwater remediation systems under realistic environmental conditions.

Indexed as

adsorptionarseniccobaltdesorptiongroundwater remediation

Identifiers

PMID41303979
PMCPMC12654324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.