Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41303948›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Directional Auxetic Behavior of Mechanical Metamaterials: Material-Dependent and Geometry-Driven Mechanisms.

Barbara Schürger, Jozef Bocko, Peter Frankovský, Ingrid Delyová, Ján Kostka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbara SchürgerDepartment of Applied Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Letná 1/9, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-3758-513X
Jozef BockoDepartment of Applied Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Letná 1/9, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-3158-3507
Peter FrankovskýDepartment of Applied Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Letná 1/9, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-9273-6696
Ingrid DelyováDepartment of Applied Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Letná 1/9, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-8506-5270
Ján KostkaDepartment of Applied Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Letná 1/9, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-4612-3463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical metamaterials derive their unconventional properties from geometry rather than composition, enabling phenomena such as negative Poisson's ratio and tunable stiffness. This study presents a systematic finite element analysis of three canonical auxetic topologies-re-entrant, chiral, and anti-chiral lattices-subjected to uniaxial loading in two orthogonal directions. Four engineering metals (steel, copper, aluminum, titanium) were analyzed to evaluate how material stiffness interacts with geometry in defining auxetic response. A detailed mesh-convergence and sensitivity analysis ensured numerical reliability and isolation of geometric effects within the linear-elastic regime. The results reveal three distinct mechanisms: (i) material-sensitive auxeticity in re-entrant lattices, which achieved the most extreme negative Poisson's ratios (ν < -2.0) but with strong dependence on stiffness; (ii) directional auxeticity in chiral lattices, which exhibited negligible response under X-loading but significant negative values (ν ≈ -0.5) under Z-loading; and (iii) geometry-dominated auxeticity in anti-chiral lattices, which remained robust and nearly material-independent (ν ≈ -1.2). This comparative framework clarifies the balance between geometry- and material-driven mechanisms, extending prior single-material or single-geometry studies. The findings provide design guidelines for selecting auxetic topologies depending on whether robustness, tunability, or maximum auxetic effect is required, with direct implications for protective equipment, aerospace structures, and biomedical scaffolds.

Indexed as

anisotropy in mechanical behaviorauxetic metamaterialschiral and anti-chiral structuresfinite element analysis (FEA)material–geometry interactionnegative Poisson’s ratiore-entrant latticesstructural design applications

Identifiers

PMID41303948
PMCPMC12654822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.